With the new system where players gain -1 punishments for every 100 full games played, if they are on 0 pm's then they should gain a Ranking point indicating exception reliability and consistency.

This would provide a system where players gain an additional bonus of being ranked from 1 through to 5 stars (which means that you have played 500 games without being punished). Ranks could be given titles, for example: Lieutenant, Captain, Major, Colonel and General.

Ranking shows an additional level of reliability and 5 star players can be given privileges :).

It also has implications for high level players who can't level very much at the moment because there aren't enough players at their level - they have something to work towards other than simply leveling their account.

Currently the /gp system tells you very little about a player, and with the implementation of the new filter command, a more robust /gp would greatly assist in assuring quality games.

Idealistically one could go about this many ways. My suggestion would be to parse the map file name according to a standard list of maps. An unrecognised map file could be grouped as a Custom Map.

From there the ability to count games played per map type could simply be achieved. This feature would for one enhance the filter command greatly, but could also be used to enhance the games list. The games list could be changed to display [0 Dota]<custom name> ([0 TTW] / [0 GTD] / [0 NOTD]) for example.

It seems to be occurring more frequently now that when people lag out of a game, we are unable to /vp them due to their connections still being "live".

Perhaps the introduction of the /kc command would be helpful!

The alternative is whispering an admin, but usually I just receive a dnd message.
*Though I must admit, scant is normally available =)!

Anyways
Lets see

Command: /kc
CG: 1

/*Votes to kill the connection of a user account*/

./kc
usage: /kc <username>
./kc <username>
<Yourname> has voted to kill <username>'s connection. <X> more votes are required in order to kill the connection successfully.

----------------
Restrictions
----------------

Due to the high level of retardation possessed by some users, limitations to the command would obviously be necessary!

1. Only effective if there are 6/more players in-game.
2. 60% of the game(rounded up) are required to vote in order for it to be a success. (The percentage thing may sound complicated, but it really isn't all that complex!)
3. Perhaps a level limitation could be set on the command so as to avoid - inevitable - abuse.

Bleh, dunno
You guys decide, just an idea :D
Got plenty more in mah brain ;) methinks!

Due to smurfing & people getting banned without them receiving an official notice that they have been punished, I would like to suggest that we create a registration page that requires the user to verify his/her email address prior to a new account creation on the PvPGN server!

The emails should be kept private like on the forums and only be used for admin purposes (like notifying of offenses, etc.) I think duplicate email addresses should be allowed, but only to a certain extent - like a maximum of 3 accounts per email?

The existing PvPGN users should be given a grace period where they have to verify their email addresses too.

I think this suggestion can lead to people becoming more involved in the Twilight community.

Hey guys, the ladder war3 melee/arranged teams system doesnt "work" anymore. I posted a previous post about this but it was a different issue, and was fixed the following day. On the following day i played a few games myself, and it worked beautifully. But now all of a sudden (2 days later), whenever the game STARTS in arranged teams, atleast two of us four get disconnected straight away after the minifreeze in the game. Now iv checked that we all have maps, all can host, and have tried the same thing with even different people (thus different connections), and it still didnt budge. Was hoping you guys could fix it again please. Thanks so much.

I was wondering if its possible to make \levelall or \levelstat command in war3 chat to see how many accounts are what levels, like

There are 114 people in w3
L 0 - 10 = 50
L 11 - 20 = 24
L 21 - 30 = 20
L 31 - 40 = 7
L 41 - 50 = 0
L 51 - 60 = 2
L 61 - 70 = 1
L 71 - 80 = 0
L 81 - 50 = 0
L 91 - 100 = 10

Or something similar to this? If possible or got the time
The reason for this its easier to host and the last 2 nights I hardly see level 25 games.

This command will return the age of a user account.
This will be useful for various reasons including but not limited to:
1. User experience level recognition
2. Inquire about legitimacy of an account (i.e. saLdin spoof)

The command will function as follows:
/age [username]
>>Note the []brackets which mean the command will function with or without a specified username.
(/age = return current account age | /age [username] = return target account age)
Cg requirement: 1

The account age will rough so as to minimize bandwidth usage as well as expertise. The age should return a value such as:
"1 < Account Age < 2" - account age is between one and two years.

E.g.
Bob - age: 5 years
Sally - age 2 years 5 months
Tessa: 2 months (anything less than one year really)

/age Bob:
Bob's account age: 5 year(s)

/age Sally:
2 years(s) < Sally's account age < 3 year(s)

/age Tessa:
Tessa's account age < 1 year(s)

Or some other functionality, as long as it's low maintenance. :) Ah well, lets see.